4 Comments
User's avatar
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

It must have taken you a while to put this all together, but if you really studied 9/11, you won't muddle up the evidence as you've done in this article.

When you actually study the evidence, it's really easy to see who is discussing evidence and who is selling you a theory or hypothesis...

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

There are three key layers to perception management:

(i) the official narrative,

(ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and

(iii) the truth.

Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.

The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.

The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.

The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.

Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.

Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

Wikipedia's block listed 9/11 scientist.

Cancelled by Wikipedia for 14 years and counting.

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/wikipedias-block-listed-911-scientist

Elephant in the "Plane Hugging" 9/11 Truth Movement Living Room

A Difficult Fact: No Emergency Locator Transmissions on 9/11

Article: https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/elephant-in-the-plane-hugging-911

Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11

Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/going-in-search-of-planes-in-nyc

The 9/11 Hoodwink at Shanksville, PA

No Jet Fuel, or a plane at the Flight 93 Crash Site

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/hoodwinked-at-shanksville-on-911

The PentaCon on 9/11

When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911

9/11 Movie Nights

Revisit 9/11 with "9/11 Revisionist" and watch some of the best documentaries

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-movie-nights

Expand full comment
Shona Duncan's avatar

Hi, thank you. No I haven't really studied 9/11 and although you can see I have read quite a lot about it I have not given it much thought. This ss post is a document dump in case one day I get time to sort it out and think about it. Meanwhile please feel free to take any reference you want. I know it is very messy and I almost didn't create a post about it but I wanted somewhere to hold the information while I answered the other questions in the other ss post. Cheers :-) s

Expand full comment
9/11 Revisionist's avatar

I was glad to see you used come of my content in your article.

I hope you'll dive into what I shared with you above...

Expand full comment
Shona Duncan's avatar

Yes I will, hopefully sooner rather than later! It is great to have that information there for when I am ready (I have around 800 emails to clear!).

Expand full comment